11 Great Horror and Thriller Movies to Watch This Halloween

Last night I had the idea to make this list. I haven't made many lists on my blog, and most of those are just "My favourite movies" and "My favourite TV shows", and frankly those are tiring. They are boring for you and they are boring for me. So I'm making my first themed list, and since it's 31st of October, that theme is horror and thriller. 

I've read through my blog and gathered 11 movies that I thought I could re-introduce on this list. I've wrote about these before, sometimes even twice. Not all of these are very new to you, but you might have forgotten about few. And of course there are some classics we should remember to watch.

---

Attack The Block (2011), dir. Joe Cornish

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A teen gang has to defend themselves from an alien invasion. I watched this movie with my friend once and we thought it would be some kind of B-movie, but it was way scarier than we thought. This film is absolutely astonishing visually, the writing is clever, cast is brilliant and it will keep you on the edge of your seat. There are few quite obvious jump scares, but this movie was still amazing.

9 / 10

Battle Royale (2000), dir. Kinji Fukasaku

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

In Battle Royale, a class of students is forced to fight and kill each other. Now Battle Royale isn't exactly scary, but it's still a thriller, and a damn clever one. This one is a cult classic, so if you're not into horror, but you like violent cult movies, this is the movie for you.

9 / 10

Death Proof (2007), dir. Quentin Tarantino

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

Two different groups of women are being stalked by an ex-stuntman with a death proof car. I wish I'd watched Planet Terror by now, so I could throw them both on the list, but no. Anyway, Death Proof is a homage to this kind of exploitation movies. Again, not scary, but amazing and thrilling. A cult movie everyone should see, and definitely worth a watch. Hey, it has to be good, if I usually hate car chases and car related movies of all sorts yet I love this.

9 / 10

From Dusk Till Dawn (1996), dir. Robert Rodriguez

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

Two criminals end up in a bar populated by vampires. This is a B-movie, and it's absolutely ridiculous, I love that. The dialogue is clever, since it's written by Tarantino, and Robert Rodriguez is a marvellous director. If any other people were behind this movie, it would be a disaster. Well, it's kind of a disaster now, but in a fun way.

7 / 10

Hostel (2005), dir. Eli Roth

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

Three backpackers end up in a hostel in eastern Europe without knowing what kind of hell awaits them. Hostel is full on torture porn. It's not exactly scary, but it's super disgusting and full of gore. So if you're into that, Hostel is your movie. Obviously this goes for Hostel Part II as well, I just didn't want to have two Hostel movies on the same list. But don't watch the third one. Everything is wrong with that one.

9 / 10

Jennifer's Body (2009), dir. Karyn Kusama

Scary (a little bit) / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A high school teenager turns into a succubus who preys on her male classmates. Jennifer's Body is written by Diablo Cody, who is amazing writer. Again, this movie is ridiculous in a way, but it's one of my favourite movies. The cast is amazing and there's not one thing I don't love about this movie.

8 / 10

Oculus (2013), dir. Mike Flanagan

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A woman tries to prove that a murder that was pinned on his brother was actually committed by a supernatural phenomenon living in a mirror. I saw glimpses of this movie at school once. This movie fucks with your mind and plays with time a lot. The movie is so creepy. I've only watched it once, but it affected me a lot never the less.

7 / 10

Orphan (2009), dir. Jaume Collet-Serra

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A family adopts a nine-year-old, who turns out not to be as innocent as they first thought. When I watched this movie I already knew the most important plot twist, yet it was still so unnerving. This movie is very creepy and definitely worth another watch if you've already seen it.

7 / 10

Saw (2004), dir. James Wan

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

I've never seen the rest of the Saw movies, only the first one. The rest seem like they are just gore and they want to get as much money as possible, but the first Saw was brilliant. There's not so much unnecessary gore and it's very clever. So if you've been avoiding Saw movies because of how much they are spilling blood, watch the first one. It's good.

8 / 10

Shaun of the Dead (2004), dir. Edgar Wright

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A man decides to win back his girlfriend and get rid of the zombies wandering around in the neighbourhood. Shaun of the Dead is a hilarious zombie movie. It's amazing British horror comedy. This movie is so much fun, yet it has all the drama of a good old zombie movie.

9 / 10

The Silence of the Lambs (1991), dir. Jonathan Demme

Scary / Funny / Thrilling / Disgusting / WTF / B-Movie

A young FBI cadet has to catch a serial killer with the help of another. This is the movie that made me into thrillers. Absolutely brilliant movie, so very slow  yet still absolutely thrilling. The whole cast of this movie is astonishing. This is a classic, and if you haven't seen it yet, or haven't seen it in a while, watch it. Just watch this astonishing movie.

9 / 10

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010)

Directed by: David Yates 

Written by: J.K. Rowling (novel) & Steve Kloves (screenplay)

Harry, Ron and Hermione are trying to find and destroy mystical and dangerous items known as horcruxes to finally destroy lord Voldemort.

---

The ending is closer and the movies are worse. Still they are trying to make an action film out of Harry Potter, but what's worse is how the filmmakers clearly don't know what to cut. There is such a long time of... nothing. They do nothing. There's some dialogue but it's not always entirely insightful. And there's the weird dance scene and all that. Yes, those scenes how Harry, Ron and Hermione were on the run for a really long time, but that's really frustrating for the audience. How about you cut that and make this film shorter - or better yet - include some things that were in the books but were barely mentioned in the movie.

I also don't like the point where they cut the movie in two. I've checked so many times what is the half point of the book, and I think they should've cut the movie around there - where that chapter ends at least. But I guess they wanted to stuff the Deathly Hallows into this movie. 

Best part of the whole movie is the Tale of the three brothers. It's visually more stunning than anything we've seen in Harry Potter movies. It's so awesome it seems completely out of place in this movie. It's still of course an interesting piece of lore, and a nice way to take a break from the events in the movie. 

Everything went downhill after Prisoner of Azkaban. I've been wondering why I don't like Harry Potter so much anymore, but this seems to be the reason. None of the later movies were good.

☆☆☆

3 / 10

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince (2009)

Directed by: David Yates

Written by: J.K. Rowling (novel) & Steve Kloves (screenplay)

Harry's sixth year is off to a weird start. Snape is finally the Defence Against Dark Arts teacher, and they have a new potions master. Harry also gets private lessons from Dumbledore, to discover crucial details about lord Voldemort's past.

---

Yates's style still annoys me. He's trying to force fantasy literature into action. With Yates directing it seems that the grim visual side and "action" is more important than the actual story. And again, the idea of a dark fantasy story is making the movie so dark it's hard to see. That kind of aesthetic only suits David Fincher, and Yates is nowhere near his brilliance.

Also the romance side doesn't work at all in this movie. Sure, teenage romance is of course a bit awkward, but this is so outrageously clumsy it's painful to look at the scenes. The writer still hasn't managed to capture Ginny Weasley, nor has he decided what she should be like. Ginny is a completely different character compared to what she was like as a small child and even when Half-Blood Prince is compared with Order of Phoenix. Did the writers just want to have someone cool to be Harry's love interest? She is nowhere near as cool as she is in the book. Why is it so hard for men to write believable female characters? 

But if there is one character this movie manages to capture it's Draco Malfoy. Still, there's no sign of actual character development, because in the fifth movie he was still that annoying school bully and now he's, well... this. To be honest, that development happens very quickly in the books also. It's of course understandable, but slightly annoying. 

I love how they still pretend like now we get some real insight into Voldemort's past when we see like two memories of him. It's ridiculous. 

Half-Blood Prince is slightly better than the fifth movie. Maybe it took Yates some time to get used to the series. Still, he just doesn't seem to quite grasp the idea of Harry Potter, he just wants to make dark fantasy action for young adults.

☆☆☆☆☆

5 / 10

Harry Potter and the Order of Phoenix (2007)

Directed by: David Yates

Written by: J.K. Rowling (novel) & Michael Goldenberg (screenplay)

Harry Potter returns to the wizard world only to realise very few people have taken Voldemort's return seriously, and the ministry is trying to discredit both him and Dumbledore.

---

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the first Harry Potter movie directed by David Yates. Some fans love Yates and his different style, but there are people who don't like him, myself included. Sure, he's the one responsible for my favourite half of the series, where Harry is growing up and everything is darker. But in the movies the characters aren't as deep and the darkness feels more like a colour scheme than a change in the story telling.

Yates's style chooses action over the story - which makes no sense when considering what the novel was like. Order of the Phoenix had very little action, but it explored wonderfully, for example, Harry after seeing Voldemort returning and seeing Cedric Diggory being brutally murdered. In the movie you can see it bothers Harry, he is incredibly angry, but that's that. If you haven't read the book it only seems like Harry is having his puberty and therefore a bit moody, even if you could claim he has a case of PTSD. 

There are many emotional scenes in the novel that weren't included in the movie. They were completely forgotten or replaced by something really, really weird, apart from few that were important to the plot - they saved the scenes that were important when looking at this one movie, but ignored the story as a whole, and they seemed to figure character development was not that important. Harry Potter series is not seven separate stories it's one story in seven parts. 

At this point it's clear the filmmakers didn't care about the story as much as making the movies and making fans watch them and just get through the whole series. 

But it's lovely to see the film allowing few characters develop properly: like Neville during the DA. They tried to fake Ginny developing as well by only showing us that she is indeed amazing with spells. Still the filmmakers have forgotten to give her any sort of personality. I love her in the books but in movies she's just an empty husk - skillful of course, but she's not as interesting as in the books. 

'

Order of Phoenix is over-simplified and is trying to force a story into a film form in the easiest way possible. Yes, sure, they didn't have so much time to focus on the stories individually considering the stars were growing up but still, this is ridiculous. 

☆☆☆☆

4 / 10

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005)

Directed by: Mike Newell

Written by: J.K. Rowling (novel) & Steve Kloves (screenplay)

It's Harry Potter's fourth year in Hogwarts, and this year the school is hosting the Triwizard Tournament, where three students from three different schools compete in dangerous tasks. Since the competitors have to be at least 17 years old, Harry and his friends have no intention of taking part. But the night the competitors are announced by the goblet of fire, somehow Harry turns out the be the fourth one...

---

After the magnificent Prisoner of Azkaban, The Goblet of Fire is just a horrible downgrade. Yes, the book is long and there's no way every scene would be in it, but so much has been left behind. The beginning is butchered, so is the school year. Now it seems like nothing else happened except for the Triwizard Tournament. The main characters had like one class during the entire year. They should've made the movie longer. Three hours may be a long movie, but it's better to make it long than make it seem like all this happened in few months instead of one school year. Seasons barely changed!

This film includes the one change everyone hates: Dumbledore was supposed to calmly ask Harry if he put his name in the goblet of fire, but for some reason Michael Gambon's Dumbledore is furious 24/7 and even violent. It makes no sense. Of course Dumbledore is quite a reckless headmaster, but with Richard Harris he seemed gentle, just the right way. If Michael Gambon can't pull of that kind of gentleness, they should've cast someone else. Everyone loved Harris, he was the perfect Dumbledore. After he died, did the people in charge of casting just think, "Ah, fuck it, let's choose someone completely different". 

One thing I like is how dark the ending is. It's a good prelude to how dark the last movies are going to be. Of course now it seems like the movies are starting to be too scary for kids. It's hard for me to watch few scenes because of how gruesome they are, so how do they except children to watch them? 

All the charm Prisoner of Azkaban is gone. If one Harry Potter movie clearly needs a remake, it's this one. 

☆☆☆☆☆

5 / 10

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004)

Directed by: Alfonso Cuarón

Written by: J.K. Rowling (novel) & Steve Kloves (screenplay)

Harry Potter's third year in Hogwarts is shadowed by another threath: a dangerous murderer Sirius Black has escaped the prison of Azkaban, and is apparently after Harry.

---

Cuarón was a way better choice compared to Columbus! Columbus' versions were clearly meant more for kids than (young) adults, but Cuarón knows how to make a film truly for the whole family. Prisoner of Azkaban is of course scary for kids, but not too terrifying, yet still thrilling for anyone older. 

Visually Prisoner of Azkaban exceeds two previous movies. It's a lot different, considering how simple the first movies tried to be. There cinematography is astonishing and the camera moves in fun ways - like through windows or mirrors, and that always fascinated me as a kid. Even if movies are meant for children, cinematographers shouldn't shy away from eccentric, artistic choices because kids will love them. 

Also Prisoner of Azkaban rocks as an adaptation. It has scenes that didn't exist in the book and many details added by those who made this film, yet they all work. Those conversations between Harry and Lupin were always amazing and even if they weren't in the book or they were in the book but in a different form, those conversations were amazing and deep and gave... some hope to it. Also this is the only movie that has Harry's messy hair right.

Prisoner of Azkaban really stands out from all the other Harry Potter movies. It's no wonder many claim it to be their favourite.

☆☆☆☆☆☆☆☆

8 / 10